Health Psychology Research / HPR / Online First / DOI: 10.14440/hpr.0253
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Prevalence of Fear of COVID-19 and Its Impact on Mental Health in Post-Pandemic Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study

Ahmet Alkal*
Show Less
1 Department of Office Services and Secretariat, Vocational School of Social Sciences, Bingöl University, Bingöl 12000, Turkey
Submitted: 11 August 2025 | Revised: 29 October 2025 | Accepted: 31 October 2025 | Published: 13 February 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background

COVID-19 has significantly affected mental health worldwide. However, limited evidence exists regarding the prevalence of COVID-19 fear and its psychological impact in post-pandemic Turkey.

Objective

This research examines the prevalence of fear of COVID-19 in Turkey during the post-pandemic phase and explores its potential impact on various aspects of mental health.

Methods

In this study, 768 participants (60.3% female) completed online questionnaires assessing fear of COVID-19, depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction, and mental well-being.

Results

A high level of fear of COVID-19 was identified in 56.2% of participants. Logistic regression analyses revealed that being female, middle-aged, having a low perceived socioeconomic status, and a prior COVID-19 diagnosis significantly increased the likelihood of experiencing high levels of fear of COVID-19. However, losing someone due to COVID-19 was not significantly associated with fear levels. High levels of fear of COVID-19 were significantly associated with increased likelihood of depression and anxiety. A one-unit increase in fear of COVID-19 was associated with 2.60-fold higher odds of mild depression and 3.87-fold higher odds of moderate depression. Similarly, the odds of experiencing mild anxiety and moderate anxiety increased by 4.05 and 6.45 times, respectively. No significant associations were found between fear of COVID-19 and life satisfaction or mental well-being.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that, in the post-pandemic period, the psychological legacy of the outbreak continues to influence individuals’ emotional states. These findings emphasize the importance of COVID-19-related psychological support services for high-risk groups to mitigate the enduring mental health impacts of the pandemic.

Keywords
Fear of COVID-19
Life satisfaction
Mental health
Mental well-being
Post-pandemic period
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
References
  1. Necho M, Tsehay M, Birkie M, Biset G, Tadesse E. Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and psychological distress among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;67(7):892–906. doi: 10.1177/0020764021100312

 

  1. Zeng N, Zhao YM, Yan W, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long term physical and mental sequelae of COVID-19 pandemic: call for research priority and action. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(1):423–433. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01614-7

 

  1. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

 

  1. Rajkumar RP. COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian J Psychiatry. 2020;52:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066

 

  1. World Health Organization. Statement on the fifteenth meeting of the IHR (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 May 5. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth- meeting-of-the-ihr-(2005)-emergency-com-mittee-on-the-COVID-19-pandemic [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 24]

 

  1. World Health Organization. Pandemic Influenza Risk Management: A WHO guidance document [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/ docs/default-source/documents/pandamic-influenza-risk-management.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 24]

 

  1. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Interior. 81 Provincial Governorships Sent the Full Lockdown Measures Circular [Internet]. Ankara: Ministry of Interior; 2021. Available from: https:// www.icisleri.gov.tr/81-il-valiligine-tam-kap-anma-tedbirleri-genelgesi-gonderildi [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 24]

 

  1. Kathirvel N. Post  COVID-19 pandemic mental health challenges. Asian J Psychiatry. 2020;53:102430. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102430

 

  1. Silva Moreira P, Ferreira S, Couto B, et al. Protective elements of  mental  health status during the COVID-19 outbreak in the Portuguese population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041910

 

  1. Aden D, Zaheer S. Investigating the FLiRT variants of COVID-19: Is it an emerging concern? Pathol Res Pract. 2024;262:155542. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155542

 

  1. Sallam M, Al-Sanafi M, Sallam M. A global map of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates per country: an updated concise narrative review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;21–45. doi: 10.2147/ JMDH.S347669

 

  1. Kiviruusu O, Ranta K, Lindgren M, et al. Mental health after the COVID-19 pandemic among Finnish youth: a repeated, cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024;11(6):451–460. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00108-1

 

  1. Macalli M, Castel L, Jacqmin-Gadda H, et al. Depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among university students before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2025;369:149–154.  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.093

 

  1. Taquet M, Skorniewska Z, De Deyn T, et al. Cognitive and psychiatric symptom trajectories 2–3 years after hospital admission for COVID- 19: a longitudinal, prospective cohort study in the UK. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024;11(9):696–708. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00214-1

 

  1. Liu H, Zhou N, Zhou Z, Tao X, Kong Y, Zhang M. Symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder and their relationship with the fear of COVID−19 and COVID−19 burden among health care workers after the full liberalization of COVID−19 prevention and control policy in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):902. doi: 10.1186/ s12888-023-05399-z

 

  1. Luo D, Mei B, Wang P, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for persistent symptoms after COVID- 19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;30(3):328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.10.016

 

  1. Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20:68–82. doi: 10.1007/s1146919020-00270-8

 

  1. Satici B, Gocet-Tekin E, Deniz ME, Satici SA. Adaptation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Its association with psychological distress and life satisfaction in Turkey. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19:1980–1988. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00294-0

 

  1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety  Stress  Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: DASS Publications; 1995.

 

  1. Sariçam H. The psychometric properties of Turkish version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. J Cogn Behav Psychother Res. 2018;7(1):19. doi: 10.5455/JCBPR.274847

 

  1. Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–75.  doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

 

  1. Dağlı A, Baysal N. Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: The study of validity and reliability. Electron J Soc Sci. 2016;15(59):1250–1262.

 

  1. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;29:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63

 

  1. Keldal G. Turkish Version of the Warwick- Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale: A validity and reliability study. J Happiness Well-Being. 2015;3(1):103–115.

 

  1. Jakobsen M, Jensen R. Common method bias in public management studies. Int Public Manag  J.  2015;18(1):3–30. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2014.997906

 

  1. Nikopoulou VA, Holeva V, Parlapani E, et al. Mental health screening for COVID-19: A proposed cutoff score for the Greek version of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S). Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2022;20:907–920. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00414-w

 

  1. Lee D. The convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity  of  the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21). J Affect Disord.  2019;259:136–142.  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.036

 

  1. Zhai Y, Du X. Loss and grief amidst COVID- 19: A path to adaptation and resilience. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:80–81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.053

 

  1. Özmen S, Özkan O, Özer Ö, Yanardağ MZ. Investigation of COVID-19 fear, well-being and life satisfaction in Turkish society. Soc Work Public Health. 2021;36(2):164–177. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1877589
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research